sgusers9的部落格

打印成像的準確度及色彩質素是個別專業的業務運作關鍵，迷你倉出租安捷材料試驗有限公司（A.E.S） 是其中之一。該公司為建築行業的測驗實驗室，隸屬中國海洋石油總公司，於香港獨立運作，負責檢驗鑽油台等海洋架構的安全，以及檢測和校準建築物內的金屬材料，例如鋼。該公司技術總監李志良表示，由於檢測的過程必須一絲不苟，加上建築方面的相關法例規定，公司需要為客戶提供文件正本，自己則要儲存電子副本，現時相關的資料儲存量已逾2TB。由於行業屬性，公司對整體工作流程的要求比較嚴謹，特別是文件處理及打印質素。「作為檢測公司，報告的打印質素非常重要，有些打印機會隨時間出現老化，導致影像移位或色差，直接影響報告的可信性。」故此，該公司尋求打印質素經大量打印及複印後仍能保持一致的打印系統，以及簡化的文件管理系統，處理公司內過百種文件表格。增條碼建專業形象最後，A.E.S選擇富士施樂為合作夥伴，改善文件管理。其中，後者為該公司編寫一套程式，利用檔案編號及客戶名稱搜尋檔案，改善儲存倉統利用光學字源辨識（OCR）技術搜索文件過程費時的問題。李志良又補充，現有度身訂造的條碼（Barcode）系統，能為每個客戶的報告正本增設條碼，掃描條碼即可擷取有關檔案的電子版本，提高效率的同時，也給予客戶專業的形象。中小企倚靠IT外援A.E.S屬中小型規模企業，本地員工人數約50多人，未有獨立設立資訊科技管理部門，過往只靠系統整合（SI）服務公司協助管理公司IT。然而，SI的質素參差，資源也有限，未能及時有效應付A.E.S所需。但採用富士施樂專為中小企業而設的資訊科技管理支援服務（MITSS）後，由顧問提供IT意見及支援，例如因A.E.S的辦公室空間有限，建議採用虛擬化技術節省伺服器負擔。相關支援服務亦提供服務水平承諾，除了為公司設備安裝軟件監察狀況，一旦出現問題也會於四小時內由專人上門解決。李志良坦言：「對資源、知識有限的中小型企業，這類服務較切合要求。」Text、Photo：冼皓昕 Art：edyue Editor：Jean迷你倉沙田

Source: Star-News, Wilmington, N.自存倉C.July 16--The fairness of the removal of former New Hanover County commissioner Brian Berger is now the central question before the court.FactsWhat's next:Attorneys for former Commissioner Brian Berger and the county will now have the opportunity to file any additional evidence to support their positions on the amotion hearing's overall fairness. This evidence is due in mid-August. It will then be up to the judge to decide whether or not to hold an additional hearing.Attorneys representing the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners and Berger met at N.C. Business Court in Greensboro Tuesday afternoon for a nearly three-hour hearing.Berger was removed from the county board May 20 following an amotion hearing. The commissioners voted 3-2 to oust him, with Berger and Commissioner Jonathan Barfield voting against the move.The former commissioner filed an appeal of the decision with the New Hanover County Superior Court in mid-June. The case was later assigned to Special Superior Court Judge James Gale.Gale on Tuesday was scheduled to decide whether an amotion is a proper way to remove an elected official and whether the rules for the amotion hearing passed by the board allowed for due process. If Gale had ruled that the amotion was valid, he would have had to determine whether the court has the jurisdiction and power to review an appeal.However, after listening to hour-long opening arguments from John Martin, who represented the county commissioners, and Christopher Anglin, who represented Berger, Gale decided that his decision would solely focus on due process."I personally do not believe I have authority to do anything other than remand it to the board (of commissioners) with instructions," Gale said Tuesday afternoon.Drawing the lineGale said there are two issues deserving of the most attention to help determine the appropriateness of Berger's removal using the amotion process.The first issue that should be looked at, Gale said, is where do you "draw the line, if there is one to be drawn, as to what evidence relates to ability to implement duties of office versus one's private life?"He said the second is, "What does it mean to say you're entitled to a hearing before a fair and impartial board?"Berger's attorney argued that statements made by some commissioners prior to the hearing suggest they had already made up their mind. He referenced a quote from Commissioner Jonathan Barfield during his argument, where Barfield stated that Berger's removal was a "done deal.""He (Berger) deserves to have his commission seat back because he was not afforded a fair hearing," Anglin said after the appeal hearing.Berger did not attend the hearing; instead, he was represented solely by Anglin.Berger did not respond to multiple requests for comment Tuesday afternoon. Anglin said he advised him not to come because he did not have to give any testimony and it "would have been a waste of gas."None of the current commissioners attended Tuesday's hearing. The county was represented by county attorneys Wanda Copley and Sharon Huffman, in addition to Martin.Martin rebutted Anglin's arguments, citing statements that suggested board members during the May 20 amotion hearing had kept an open mind and instances where commissioners said they even hoped to hear evidence that would lead them in a decision not to remove Berger from office.Gale did not make a determination on whether due process was followed. But he did say that if it is found that due process was not followed, the only authority he has is to send the issue back for a retrial.Antiquated or not?While Gale chose not to rule on the overarching questions surrounding the amotion process, the viability of the process still dominated much of Tuesday's hearing.Anglin argued that the amotion process used to remove Berger is too antiquated to be used and that it is obsolete in its current form."The last case to address the process of amotion in North Carolina was used in 1908," he said. "That was 103 years ago."But Gale called it an "uphill battle to say it wasn't common law at the time."Martin also used some of his time to debate the age of the law. He said it didn't matter the age of the amotion process nor of the Supreme Court cases that upheld it.Gale said he was inclined to agree."I'll admit I'm struggling to find a basis to choose not to follow Supreme Court decisions even though they're old," he said.Anglin said it will have to be up to a higher court to determine whether the amotion hearing is a valid way to remove an elected official from office."If someone is going to invalidate the amotion process itself, it's going to be the North Carolina Court of Appeals or the North Carolina Supreme Court," he said.Anglin and Martin will now have the opportunity to file more evidence to support their positions on the fairness of Berger's original amotion hearing. The two sides will have until mid-August to bring forward new points and then an additional week for rebuttals.It will be up to Gale to decide whether the two sides must meet in court again. However, Martin said it was "unlikely" another hearing will be held solely on due process.Metro desk: 343-2384On Twitter: @StarNewsMolly3:35 p.m. update -- Case now focuses on due processThere will be no final ruling on the amotion process today, Gale declared after the court's short recess.Gale will wait to make his decision on whether or not the amotion process is a viable option for counties and municipalities to remove elected officials.The hearing will now focus on due process. Gale must determine whether or not Berger was granted due process during New Hanover County's amotion hearing back in May.3:25 p.m. update -- Judge asks for focus on 2 questionsWhile Tuesday's hearing is meant to determine the viability of the amotion process entirely, Gale said that there are two issues deserving of the most attention to help determine the appropriateness of Berger's removal using the amotion process.The first issue that should be looked at, Gale said, is where do you "draw the line, if there is one to be drawn, as to what evidence relates to ability to implement duties of office versus one's private life?"He said the second is, "What does it mean to say you're entitled to a hearing before a fair and impartial board?"Gale asked the two sides to focus their arguments to help them answer these questions.3:15 p.m. update -- Hearing back in session after short recessThe age of the last known case to address to the address the amotion process in North Carolina has been one of the most discussed topics during the hearing today.Anglin argued that the amotion process used to remove Berger is obsolete in its current form."The last case to address the process of amotion in North Carolina was used in 1908," he said. "That was 103 years ago."But Gale called it an "uphill battle to say it wasn't common law at the time."Martin迷你倉新蒲崗also used his time -- both sides were given one hour for initial arguments -- to debate the age of the law. He said it didn't matter the age of the amotion process nor of the Supreme Court cases that upheld it.Gale said he was inclined to agree."I'll admit I'm struggling to find a basis to choose not to follow Supreme Court decisions even though they're old," he said. "... I struggle to get there. I then look at the question as to has the law evolved."The hearing took a brief recess around 3 p.m.Court is now back in session and Anglin has taken the stand once again to answer Gale's questions.2:35 p.m. update -- Antiquated, yes; but amotion still valid processJohn Martin, who is representing the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners, took the stand just after 2 p.m.Martin is both rebutting Anglin's case while presenting his own. His argument and the county's entire stance rests on convincing Gale that the amotion process is a viable option for counties and municipalities to use to remove an elected official.Anglin had argued previously that the amotion process is too outdated to be usable, but Martin fought back against that assumption. He tried to tell the judge why he thought it hadn't been used in decades and said the timing of these cases didn't matter.Martin made a similar argument in the board's opposition document filed last week. He states in the document that though the amotion process might be antiquated, "the age of common law rights or case law does not affect their binding nature and precedential value."2:20 p.m. update -- Attorney says Berger's removal a 'done deal'Tuesday's hearing was designed to deal with the amotion process in the abstract to determine whether or not it is a viable process for counties and municipalities to use.However, specific examples from Berger's amotion hearing keep popping up.Anglin referenced a quote from Commissioner Jonathan Barfield during his argument, where Barfield stated that Berger's removal was a "done deal." This example was used in an effort to show the unfairness and potential bias in an amotion hearing conducted at the local level.Anglin echoed Barfield's sentiments back during the original amotion hearing in May. At that time he told the StarNews Anglin that no evidence existed that could have changed the outcome of the case and compared the hearing to a scene on "Parks and Recreation," an NBC comedy about local government in a fictional Indiana town."I feel like no matter how much we would have prepared, the outcome was predetermined," Anglin said. "I don't think any level of preparation could have taken place that would have allowed Mr. Berger a fair hearing where he would have been allowed to stay in office."John Martin, the Greenville-based lawyer for the county commissioners, is now speaking.2 p.m. update -- Questions over jurisdiction and procedureAn hour into the hearing, and Berger's attorney Christopher Anglin is still speaking.In his final piece of evidence submitted to the Business Court last Friday, Anglin cited 20 previous court cases to make his arguments. These cases cover a vast time period, ranging from 1883 to 2012.Anglin is trying to make three overarching arguments according to this document: the amotion process is not a proper way for the board of commissioners to remove and elected official; procedures used during the New Hanover County amotion hearing for Berger violated his rights to due process; and if the amotion is valid, Superior Court has the right to make the final verdict and overturn any county-level removal.All court cases he is referencing at this time are in an effort to build to those points.Although New Hanover County is represented at Tuesday's hearing by several attorneys, there are no commissioners or other staff present.Reached back in Wilmington, Woody White, chairman of the county commissioners, said he didn't think his presence was required for the court hearing."Now that it is in the courts, I did not feel it was necessary to attend," he said. "I have other county business to consider."However, White said he was following the proceedings online.1:15 p.m. update -- Berger's attorney speakingFormer New Hanover County Commissioner Brian Berger's appeal hearing in N.C. Business Court in Greensboro has started, with Christopher Anglin, Berger's Raleigh-based attorney, now speaking.Special Superior Court Judge James Gale is stopping him often, peppering him with questions.The appeal hearing today is solely to address issues and details of the amotion process, no reference will be made to whether or not Berger is fit to serve as a county commissioner.Anglin began the hearing by outlining Berger's issues with the process. This is the same argument outlined in the original appeal.He alleges that Berger did not receive due process in the hearing and that his fellow commissioners violated the state constitution by removing him.Gale is also using this time to ask questions of the original documents filed by Anglin and Berger.To watch the proceedings live, go to WWAY's streaming video feed at www.wwaytv3.com/watch-wway-live12:45 p.m. update -- Berger not in attendanceOusted New Hanover County Commissioner Brian Berger will not attend today's hearing in Greensboro. Berger will be solely represented by his attorney, Christopher Anglin from Raleigh.None of the county commissioners are expected to attend the hearing, either. New Hanover County will be represented by county attorneys Wanda Copley and Sharon Huffman.New Hanover County has raised questions about why Berger is not in attendance, but Anglin said it is not required by the court for clients to be present.The StarNews has reached out to Berger for comment, but calls and texts were not immediately returned.The hearing is scheduled to start at 1 p.m.Berger hearing scheduled to be heard this afternoonFormer New Hanover County Commissioner Brian Berger's appeal hearing is scheduled to be heard this afternoon at N.C. Business Court in Greensboro, and the judge's decision could set a new state precedent.Berger's removal from the board of commissioners on May 20 by a 3-2 vote marked the first time an amotion has been successfully used to remove a North Carolina elected official in nearly a century.Tuesday's hearing, which will be held before Special Superior Court Judge James Gale, is expected to focus on whether an amotion is a proper and viable way to remove an elected official -- not the dueling complaints and motions the county and Berger have filed against each other in recent weeks.If Gale rules the amotion is not a valid way to remove an elected official, then Berger will likely be immediately reinstated.Check back with StarNewsOnline.com throughout the afternoon for updates on the court proceedings.Copyright: ___ (c)2013 the Star-News (Wilmington, N.C.) Visit the Star-News (Wilmington, N.C.) at www.starnewsonline.com Distributed by MCT Information Services迷你倉出租

【香港商報訊】記者吳潔珊報道：本港的暑假盛事「第24屆香港書展」今日正式開鑼。今年除打破紀錄有560家參展商參與，迷你倉舉行超過400項文化活動外，展場更特設文藝廊展出衛斯理、莫言、陳冠中等著名作家的珍貴展品。貿發局副總裁周啟良表示，期望書展能突破百萬人次。展期內另一焦點項目「3D敦煌投影展」，近4000個網上名額爆滿，大會已預留名額，讓市民即場排隊入場參觀。書展期內亦會提供網上優惠，市民可列印優惠券在買書時使用。 貿發局昨午舉行書展傳媒預展。周啟良介紹，今屆書展會有300位來自不同界別的作家及講者到場作出分享，市民在到場買書外，亦可出席各類講座活動。周啟良稱，自公開網上登記以來，多場講座迅即滿座，需特別加開場地作現場轉播。 周五六夜場車船加班配合 他稱，書展會於7月19及20日開放至午夜12時，屆時新巴及九巴將於這兩天晚上10時至凌晨1時，提供特別巴士服務，直接由會展新翼博覽道入口開出，前往美孚(105R)及觀塘(111R)。渡海小輪亦於周五及周六晚上8時起，增加班次至每8至12分一班，尾班船為晚上11時30分。 3D 敦煌投影展預留即場名額 周啟良指出，書展期內的另一焦點項目「人間淨土—走進敦煌莫高窟3D」展覽，市民的報名情況非常文件倉烈。近4000個網上名額已告爆滿，大會已預留少量名額，讓市民現場排隊參觀，但提醒市民需提早30分鐘到場申領門票。他呼籲已成功在網上報名的市民須帶備身份證明文件、書展入場門票及3D展覽的網上確認書。由於每場只能容納30人，貿發局指會加場應付人流。 電子書設自助售賣機 而未能入場參觀的市民，亦毋須失望。周啟良稱，香港城市大學將緊接書展，於7月24至28日舉行120場放映。公眾可於今日早上10時30分，到城大邵逸夫創意媒體中心登記並索取門票，費用全免。而康樂及文化事務署亦會於2014年底舉辦大型敦煌文物展覽，屆時將展出更多敦煌瑰寶。 近年開始流行閱讀電子書，有書商將首次在書展期內，推出「電子書自動售賣機」，方便讀者下載。聯合出版集團業務發展部總經理兼聯合電子總經理梁榮錝表示，售賣機將有200本各類型的書籍可供購閱。梁指出，市民如欲購買，可到設置於展場外的兩部售賣機選購，當選取書籍後，以八達通付款，會取得一張收據。按收據內的二維條碼(QRCode)，登入系統內作登記後，便能下載書目閱讀。 他又說，今年貿發局會將書展內共3萬多本書放上網站供檢索，讓市民更易搜尋，當中1.4萬本是書展期內推出的新書，而網上亦會提供優惠，市民可列印優惠券在買書時使用。存倉

聯想（00992）第二季成為全球個人電腦PC出貨量最高的產商，文件倉其董事局主席兼行政總裁楊元慶在昨日股東會後表明，不會犧牲毛利率來換取市佔率，估計內地經濟放緩無可避免影響內地銷售，但希望智能手機及平板電腦的新產品，有助帶動內地銷售增長。數據研究公司IDC及Gartner的最新行業數據顯示，聯想已超越惠普成為全球最大PC供應商，市佔率約為16.7%。否認低價搶市佔率有報道指聯想憑價格策略以換取市佔率，楊元慶對此強烈否認，稱聯想從存倉以價格搶市場，數據亦證明聯想過去的盈利及邊際利潤均處於上升趨勢，未來繼續會憑藉產品創新領先市場。不過，聯想首席財務官黃偉明表示，中國經濟放緩無可避免會對業務造成影響，惟中國市場電腦產品的滲透率仍低，故仍看好內地市場。楊元慶則稱，聯想冀在不同產品線及市場均達致較平衡的發展，當中「PC+」產品是重點，預期今年下半年會推更多新款智能手機及平板電腦產品，目標是今個財年度的智能電話及平板電腦銷貨量，分別達5,000萬部及1,000萬台。自存倉

Source: Herald-Journal, Spartanburg, S.迷你倉價錢C.July 16--Ten medical technology startups from all over the world comprising the inaugural class of The Iron Yard LLC's new business accelerator in Spartanburg punched in on Monday.FactsThe Iron Yard LLC's Inaugural Accelerator ClassCompany: 3ScanOfficer: Todd HuffmanHometown: San FranciscoDescription: Automated microscopy tools and software for large-scale tissue analysis.*Company: Second LightOfficer: Ajay Pal SinghCountry: IndiaDescription: A platform to facilitate data exchange to improve experience in elder care.*Company: Prime GenomicsOfficer: Sandy ShawHometown: San FranciscoDescription: Low-cost, non-intrusive breast cancer screening via saliva.*Company: ThoroughCareOfficer: Dan GodlaHometown: Philadelphia, Pa.Description: Assessment tools to give payers and ACOs a new and efficient way to engage members.*Company: HealthPlotterOfficer: Senthil PremrajHometown: Indianapolis, Ind.Description: A wellness platform that incentivizes results as opposed to participation.*Company: VhedaOfficer: Shameet LuharHometown: MarylandDescription: Proprietary analytics to drive lifestyle and behavior changes for patients living with chronic disease.*Company: FitStepsOfficer: Darlene RodilloHometown: GreenvilleDescription: A platform to connect nutrition and activity to the body's use of energy through visual cues.*Company: Care.IT*Company: MyDocTimeOfficer: Jim NessHometown: SpartanburgDescription: An online service that helps people find doctors and to schedule appointments.*Company: ChartSpanOfficer: Jon-Michial CarterHometown: Houston, TexasDescription: an automated tool that allows users to upload, store and manage healthcare records on a smartphone, tablet or computer.The teams, whose entrepreneurial concepts were chosen in June from a large pool of applicants, reported for duty at the Greenville-based accelerator's 7,000-square-foot downtown facility at 151 S. Daniel Morgan Ave. adjacent to Hub-Bub.They each received a welcome package that included a six-pack of RJ Rockers' Son of a Peach Wheat Ale, a basket of Spartanburg-grown peaches, a Visitors Guide and some other goodies with a local bent.It was the moment area business leaders have waited months for, ringing in what they believe is a new area in the county's entrepreneurial culture, on par with the technology startup trend that is sweeping much larger metropolitan areas across the nation.While only time will tell if the next big idea like Facebook or Google is among the flock, officials hope the accelerator will help create a fertile environment for cutting-edge ventures to thrive, creating jobs and investment."It was one of those moments where you felt all of the pieces fell into place," said Kate McCarthy, program manager for The Iron Yard. "It's really exciting. These are people who are taking big risks. It's our job to connect them with opportunities that will hopefully catapult them ... It's 10 companies, but it really feels like one team. It's a real honor to be able to facilitate that."McCarthy said each team is in a different stage of growth. Some have already launched their companies, while others are still refining their concepts.Each team gets $20,000 in seed funding and other perks in exchange for 6 percent equity in their company. They get amenities like legal and financial advice, office space, and living space on迷你倉庫site for companies who relocate from out of town.The accelerator runs for three months, but companies get their office space for a full year.Some of the owners will live in apartments at Hub-Bub, or other residential developments downtown while they take part in the accelerator.Participants said they are happy to be surrounded by other aspiring entrepreneurs in the medical field and believe that they can learn from each other as they plot out the future of their companies."It has been exciting," said Darlene Rodillo, co-owner of a startup that helps people connect nutrition to physical activity. "Just walking in, it has been cool to see the setup and to meet everybody. We all have different experiences."Rodillo, of Abbeville, gave up a lucrative career in pharmaceutical sales to enter Clemson University's MBA program, where she met her business partner Richard Pascal of Chapin."I really have no doubt that (The Iron Yard) will prepare us very well," Rodillo said. "Just being chosen is justification enough that we have something ... I couldn't sleep last night because I was so excited."Max Gillespie, of Spartanburg, is an investor in MyDocTime, an online directory and scheduling tool for doctors started by Jim Ness, of Inman and Mike Roberts, of Greenville.He said he has high hopes that the accelerator will help transform Spartanburg's business landscape."(Spartanburg) could be a hub for medical companies," Gillespie said. "It's exciting to think that a town of this size could influence the future of technology and we'd love to be a part of that."Jon-Michial Carter, of Houston, Texas, is founder of ChartSpan, an automated tool that allows users to upload, store and manage healthcare records on a smartphone, tablet or computer.He said and he his business partners applied to a handful of health care accelerators across the country and were finalists in three selections, but chose The Iron Yard above the others."They were engaging, more personal and they spent more time with us," Carter said. "They went out of their way to engage with us. I have high expectations and I can tell it's going to be better than that. It's an environment that matches our company's culture."The Iron Yard is the brainchild of former Wall Street stock broker and computer guru Peter Barth, who launched his program in Greenville last May.The Spartanburg program is the sister program to the Greenville accelerator. It will perform three functions, including the accelerator, co-working space and free computer programming classes for kids called "CoderDojo."In May, The Iron Yard secured critical partnerships for the accelerator with a few national organizations, including Health 2.0, Mayo Clinic, AbbVie and Zebra Technologies.Participants in the accelerator will have the chance to present in the Health 2.0 conference in Silicon Valley later this year.On June 1, the co-working space opened. Local entrepreneurs can use space at The Iron Yard as their headquarters for $250 per month or get what's called a cafe membership for half that cost to use the facility as touchdown space. CoderDojo also kicked off in June.For more information, visit: www.theironyard.com.Copyright: ___ (c)2013 the Spartanburg Herald-Journal (Spartanburg, S.C.) Visit the Spartanburg Herald-Journal (Spartanburg, S.C.) at www.GoUpstate.com Distributed by MCT Information Services儲存

摩根大通15日發佈報告將南航(01055.HK)2013-2015財年每股盈利預期平均下調3%，迷你倉沙田理由是客運單位收益較低及燃油價格增加。摩根大通表示，4-5月票價受壓令南航上半年業績疲弱，但票價已于6月下旬開始見底，預計下半年內地航空業盈利前景將有所改善，明年盈利增長將轉強。摩根大通報告稱，雖然內地經濟增長放緩，但仍看好航空業長期增長前景，因內地旅遊滲透率較低，預計未來航空運輸增長將會是實際國內生產總值增長率的1.5倍。從明年起，行業供需增長將轉趨良性，將南航評級上調至“增持”，目標價4.6港元。(整理/楊博)

【明報專訊】著名指揮家石信之與妻子石劉麗雲主理的香港合唱團，迷你倉價錢涉於前年安排逾50 人共8 天的歐洲之旅，遊覽之餘，同時出席本港女高音歌唱家鄭穎芬於維也納舉行的音樂會，詎料有團友投訴其營辦素質欠佳。合唱團及石劉麗雲早前分別被控無牌經營旅行業務等，昨經審訊後脫罪。劉稱籌辦旅程只為推廣音樂，「發夢都無諗過會畀人告」。裁判官裁決時說，報稱合唱團公司主席的被告石劉麗雲（64 歲），於前年7 月28 日至8 月4 日統籌「維也納金色大廳之旅」，她沒有收報酬，全程費用均由鄭穎芬資助，實報實銷。此外，控方沒法證明香港合唱團有規律地營運旅行業務，本案屬單一事件，同時接納辯方的訟費申請。8 天旅費每人逾1.9 萬元有份策劃旅程的團友李志雄供稱，他與鄭穎芬聯絡石劉麗雲籌備今次活動，並邀請石信之任鄭穎芬音樂會的指揮，8 天行程每人費用1.迷你倉庫 萬多元，李與妻子的行程費則全由鄭支付，後來二人額外各付4000 多元，作為遊覽維也納附近城市的費用。出發前，石劉麗雲安排團友簽署旅遊保險等文件，出發當天團友到達機場，始知她沒安排導遊，而她及石信之已在維也納安排音樂會事宜。李續稱，石劉麗雲「根本無能力搞旅行團，卻攬埋做」，其食宿安排差劣，又經常對老人和小孩「日鬧夜鬧」。旅程期間，80 多歲團友跌倒，她不但沒有安慰，反而斥責對方，惹來全團公憤。「團友」不滿安排差投訴此外，當團友身穿禮服往欣賞鄭的音樂會，石劉麗雲卻沒有安排旅遊車接載，眾人要從酒店步行20 分鐘到金色大廳。李對行程深感不滿，故回港後向旅行代理商註冊處投訴石劉麗雲，揭發香港合唱團無牌經營旅行業務。石劉麗雲於庭外表示，事件讓她意識到日後要小心交友，舉辦類似活動會更為防範。【案件編號：KTS3714-5/13】儲存

　　夏日炎炎，存倉去貴陽避暑休閒的浙江遊客日漸增多。　　由浙報傳媒和浙江中青旅共同精心設計和打造的四條貴州黃金旅遊線路，最近更是備受遊客歡迎。這些線路分別是：　　一、“定格原生態，尋訪侗苗寨”，貴陽黃果樹瀑布、從江�沙苗寨、肇興侗寨雙飛六日游。　　二、“觀瀑布，逛苗寨”，黃果樹瀑布、安順雲峰屯堡、天河潭景區、自存倉江苗寨雙飛五日游。　　三、“世界自然遺產，侗苗民族風情”，貴陽西江千戶苗寨、荔波大小七孔、肇興侗寨雙飛六日游。　　四、“紅色遵義,多彩貴州”，貴陽黃果樹瀑布、天河潭景區、青岩古鎮、天龍屯堡、遵義雙飛五日游。　　具體行程和旅行資訊詳見i悠遊網，或者撥打浙江中青旅免費咨詢熱線400-896-8888。　　黃大哲迷你倉新蒲崗

迷你倉出租沒有內文

　　【本報訊】統計暨普查局資料顯示，迷你倉沙田今年5月隨團來澳旅客按年增加7.7%，有721,104人次。團客以中國大陸(547,803人次)為主，來自廣東省的有174,678人次；其次為中國台灣(43,926人次)、香港(30,048人次)及大韓民國(25,011人次)旅客。今年首五個月隨團入境旅客共3,785,408人次，按年增加10.7%。　　今年5月使用旅行社服務外出的本地居民有113,268人次，按年增加20.1%。其中，參加旅行團外遊的本地居民有41,717人次，目的地主要為中國大陸、泰國及中國台灣。今年首五個月外出的居民共593,798人次，按年增幅為26.1%；隨團外遊的本地居民為218,664人迷你倉價錢。　　在5月底，全澳99間有營業的酒店及公寓可提供28,065間客房，按年增加16.4%；五星級酒店客房佔總數66.5%。　　今年5月有907,831人次入住酒店及公寓，按年增加20.3%；入住五星級酒店的增幅達43.9%至562,281人次。平均留宿時間為1.3晚，較去年同期減少0.1晚。住客主要來自中國大陸(佔總數59.2%)及香港(16.0%)。平均入住率下跌0.5個百分點至77.6%；四星級酒店的入住率有80.5%。今年首五個月住客總數共4,329,662人次，按年增加16.9%；平均入住率為79.4%，下降2.5個百分點。　　今年首五個月入住酒店旅客佔留宿旅客71.6%，高於去年同期的64.6%。迷你倉庫